More tips Footnoting Bibliographies

Writing papers

Preparing papers

Here are some general rules on preparing a well-formatted paper for this course. You've heard these from me before, but go over them again, please. They matter.

Format:  Please observe the following:

Footnotes:  Provide source references for any quotations, paraphrases, or unusual information in your papers. In the short papers for this course you can do references the easy way, just inserting a note in the text, in parentheses, after the sentence to which it refers, like this. (Hosking, 27) The comma is preferred but not required. Where the author's name alone would be ambiguous, because we have used more than one reading by the author, add a short version of the title, like this. (Djilas, Wartime, 93) On the longer papers, use full footnote form. (See the brief introduction to Footnoting below.)

Bibliography:  Generally you don't need a bibliography when you are citing only course readings. If you choose to refer to materials from outside the course on any paper, these should be fully identified somewhere -- in the notes themselves, or in a list at the end. The Week 4 paper and the research paper require a full, formal bibliography. Be sure you know how to do one -- lots of people make a hash of it the first time. (See the brief introduction to Bibliographies below.)

Quotations:

Foreign words:  Italicize or underline them. Printed texts always use italics for foreign words, but in papers underlining is an acceptable equivalent.

Three things to avoid:

Proofreading:  Proofread and correct your work, if necessary by hand. Proofreading is basic academic good manners, and like many professors I take offense when it isn't done. If someone else types a paper for you, it's still your responsibility to catch the errors. And don't rely on a spell checker alone to do the job. 

Click here for an illustration of the fallibility of spell checkers.


Preparing papers Footnoting Bibliographies

More tips

Words often misused:

"The middle class was composed of businessmen, professionals, and their families."
"The middle class comprised businessmen, professionals, and their families."

Transition words:

Some words and phrases to avoid:

Societal:  Avoid jargon, and this is a jargon word for "social".
Existed, when "were" will do:  In good expository writing, plain is better than fancy.
Possessed, when "had" will do:  The rationale is the same.
Time period:  This is redundant. Use either "time" or "period", but not both.
At this point in time:  Either "at this point" or "at this time" is OK, but both is just extra verbiage.
Occur:  This simply is a flat, boring word -- the language has lots of better ones!

Spelling and usage:  Note how the following are written:

Bureaucracy:  Think of it as rule by a bureau, meaning a government office.
World War I and World War II:  Roman numerals are always used, not the words One and Two.

Dangling phrases:  In English we expect an introductory phrase to refer to (to "modify") the subject of the main sentence that follows. If the writer means the phrase to modify something else (stated or implied), it becomes a "misplaced modifier" or "dangling phrase/participle". The effect is often comical:

Click here for more on dangling phrases, mainly from the classic book by Strunk and White.

Words of quantity:  We have different words to express quantities depending on whether the thing concerned can (in principle) be counted or not. Thus, "the majority of" can be used only of countable things, like people or votes. Otherwise use "most": thus "most of the time", not "a majority of the time". "Fewer" is the right word for countable things, while "less" is used with nouns referring to vague quantities: thus "fewer dollars", but "less money". Similarly, "a smaller number" of sea gulls, but "a smaller amount" of sand.

Compound modifiers:  When you use a phrase of two or more words to modify a noun (that is, when you use a phrase as an adjective), the words of the phrase are connected by hyphens. Thus the phrases "twentieth century", "middle class", "right wing" and "middle of the road" look like this when they are used as adjectives: "twentieth-century Europe", "middle-class values", "right-wing groups" and "middle-of-the-road politics".

Typographical matters:


Preparing papers More tips Bibliographies

Footnoting

There are variations in footnote style, but if you remember certain main points you should always be within the acceptable range:

Some examples:

1. Milovan Djilas, The New Class (London, 1957), p. 53.

2. Ibid., pp. 78-79.

3. Gale Stokes, The Walls Came Tumbling Down (New York, 1993), p. xvii.

4. "The Tito-Stalin Correspondence, March-June 1948," in Gale Stokes (ed.), From Stalinism to Pluralism (New York, 1991), p. 59.

5. Misha Glenny, "Yugoslavia: The Revenger's Tragedy," The New York Review of Books, August 13, 1992, pp. 33-35.

6. Stokes, Walls, pp. 30 and 97, and Glenny, p. 35.


Preparing papers More tips Footnoting

Bibliographies

As with footnotes, small variations in style don't matter so long as you understand the basic rules:

Some examples:

Djilas, Milovan. The New Class. London, 1957.

Djilas, Milovan. Wartime. New York, 1977.

Garton Ash, Timothy. The Polish Revolution:  Solidarity, 3rd ed. New York, 2002.

Glenny, Misha. "Yugoslavia: The Revenger's Tragedy." The New York Review of Books, August 13, 1992. Pp. 32-43.

Stokes, Gale. The Walls Came Tumbling Down. New York, 1993.

"The Tito-Stalin Correspondence, March-June 1948." In From Stalinism to Pluralism, ed. by Gale Stokes. New York, 1991. Pp. 58-65.